I saw this article on the Today Show's website which, in essence, talks about a British family who, after the mum lost her job and got slammed with the holiday marketing blitz, vowed to strike out against consumerism by not spending ANYTHING on their son (and now daughter -- yes, having a newborn and buying NOTHING for her). This is, of course, aside from any medical costs and food (although she doesn't buy into the "food marketed specifically to kids" thing). And, after a year, they're deeming it a success, and even continuing the project (with a monthly "get out of jail free" card).
After checking out the mom's blog, I get it. The fact that her "rules" on the site go as such --
1) Mama don’t preach. This isn’t about telling anyone else what to do. If you’ve read my blog before, even a couple of times, it should be pretty obvious that I DON’T KNOW. I have no answers. Just a few jumbled ideas and a wobbly will to try to do the best thing I can for the kids. Most of the time. When humanly possible. On good days.
2) Liberation not deprivation. If it turns out that any of us (Johnny, Frida, my husband, me) are less happy, more stressed, less healthy, or just generally flourishing less (wilting?) due to cutting out spending in any area, we’ll reintroduce that thing. This isn’t about being stoic, or even doing without. It’s about blundering messily but happily towards a way of life that makes us happy and content.
3) Honesty is the best policy. I will be honest. I’ll always tell you what’s going on. No sneaking purchases past this blog. Hand on heart.
-- is refreshing and lovely. She doesn't seem to be doing this to jump on the "a year doing *fill in the blank* to get tons of press" bandwagon. She genuinely knows how toxic it can be (figuratively) to have to deal with the constant onslaught of C-R-A-P as parents (and children). I mean, just look at this video:
Adorbs! Doesn't that just say it all?
Ahh. Stuff. That recurring theme of ye olde blog. I mean, just think of the influx (dare I say FLOOD) of toys (this isn't including outfits) we received for Hadman's birthday. Cuh-razy! (We've got a buttload more since Christmas, mind you. Le sigh.)
We're of the mindset that if folks would just give ONE toy (and maybe one outfit, if they get "the itch") for these special occasions, it'll make everyone a lot more comfortable (my mother's officially "scared" to get him ANY toys, and it's not because of me...simply put, it makes me super sad) and help Hadley to realize that it's more about showering him with love and kindness and appreciation and to let him know he has true worth. No one is allowed to "buy" his love, as far as I'm concerned, and we're going to have plenty of family conversations with him about it as time goes by. Y'know, when he starts to understand things better.
We also don't buy into (ha! Get it?) the "toy of the season" mentality. There's nothing he "has" to have. Not the latest Elmo thingamabobber. Not everything-Sesame-Street-because-he-likes-Sesame-Street. (Although the Easter Bunny has mentioned wanting to bring one SS-themed toy. Darn him.) Lord knows munchkin HAS more than enough already. If you took the sheer number of toys, he's reached his life quota. Seriously, that many. And he's not 2 yet.
Stop the insanity! (Remember that? From the '90s? Er...'80s, maybe? Susan Powter?)
The items that we get him tend to be creative or pretend toys that will hopefully stick around for years and years of use. Other toys that he has make him feel overwhelmed and bored SO. QUICKLY. Can you imagine? Having two huge containers of toys, literally overflowing, and feeling bored? I can imagine it. Because I see it. (Heck, when I look at all of his toys, I think, "Um, yeah. I'm going cross-eyed. Too much.") It makes complete sense.
We want him to have an imagination...and to use it. To play WITH him using OUR imaginations; inside, outside, with pots and pans and bowls and spoons, with sheets and boxes and recycled egg cartons. What greater gift is there than that? My best childhood memories are of just these things.
And there's also SO much to be said for "free play." You know, going to a park or running around your backyard like a giggling fool or digging in the dirt or...well, you know.
So, let's meander back to the topic at hand. Could we go a year without buying ANYTHING child-oriented?
It definitely got the ol' brain juices flowing. I buy him Annie's bunnies (but I eat them, too, and they're not necessarily kid-centric...just cutesy), but I also buy the whole milk yogurt that's perfectly portioned for toddlers (I swore I'd never do it, but saving 5-7 minutes in the morning? Psht.) I don't buy a lot of clothes or toys for him (family hooks us up on this front, mostly), but we have failed at cloth diapering. (Sad to even admit that.) So, purchasing dipes 'n wipes is a big one on the list.
Clearly, we couldn't fully go without getting him ANYthing...plus, I'm too spineless/lazy/imperfect/flip-floppy to do one of those "for a year" challenge thingies. Hey, at least I'm honest. *wink, wink*
However, there's a lot that I (or we, if you find it appealing) can learn from this experiment. I haven't utilized Freecycle much...er...at all. Ever. And I should. Same goes for Craigslist. So much of what she says is true, though. There's definitely a stigma that they have to be playing with the "right things" or wearing the "cutest" stuff. I find myself by nature anti-licensed character clothing. (I think it's because I didn't have much as a kid and realized I didn't really like it; exceptions are the ONE Punky Brewster t-shirt and a TMNT shirt {Michelangelo FTW!} that I owned, and maybe a hand-me-down Betty Boop sleep shirt.) I also find myself turning away those gifts because I don't want those obnoxious cartoon faces to inundate our own animated munchkin's face, y'know?
That's a tug-of-war right there. If it's willingly given, do you just accept (I actually know for a fact that doing that tends to open Pandora's box, causing us to receive even MORE stuff) graciously (which, believe me, we ARE truly grateful!) or do we pick and choose what we allow through our doors to better control what he (and we) are subjected to? Like...he's never seen a full-length Disney movie. (He knows Mickey and the rest from short films and watching his playhouse at Grandma's.) So...should he have shirts and pj's with a million images of Lightning McQueen all over them? Then there's the slipppery slope that we simply MUST own that movie (and a million others). Again, I only owned a handful of Disney flicks, and they were ones we already knew that (as a family) we loved watching over and over again. Not 50. Not 20. A handful.
And I turned out just fine. ;-)
Obviously, my head's still wrapping itself around this concept. I highly doubt we could do a full-blown challenge (even a month's worth...? Maybe? Maybe not.) like this, but it definitely is good to help consider our needs vs. our wants vs. society's perceived "you need to want"s.
Whatchya think?
No comments:
Post a Comment